Upload a drawing to review it against D1.1:2025. If a saved result is available for this exact upload, it opens straight away and does not use your allowance; otherwise a signed-in workspace is required to start a new analysis.
Beta: automated reading may miss welds or misread symbols. Check every weld against the drawing before relying on it.
A signed-in workspace is required before Flux starts a new analysis. If a saved result is available for this exact upload, it opens straight away and does not use your allowance.
📄
Drop a drawing here, or click to browse
PNG, JPG, or TIFF — max 7 MB; PDF — max 10 MB
By uploading, you agree to Terms and Privacy. Treat results as review support, not approval.
Processing...
Beta: automated reading may miss welds or misread symbols. Check every weld against the drawing before relying on it.
Upload the clearest drawing sheet you have, preferably with the weld symbols, notes, material callouts, and revision block visible. The review works best when the symbol tail, reference lines, arrow locations, and nearby dimensions are readable. Crop out unrelated title-block clutter only if it makes the weld callouts easier to inspect.
Treat the result as a review queue, not an approval stamp. Start with any symbol-identification warnings, then compare the flagged items against the contract drawing, WPS package, and project code basis. If the drawing is blurry or missing notes, rerun with a sharper sheet before escalating the issue to engineering or inspection.
Reference data from AWS D1.1/D1.1M:2025. Not affiliated with AWS. Analysis by Flux — always verify with your welding engineer.